![]() |
||
|
|

![]() The Definition, Ethics and Exemplary Practices (DEEP) of Experiential Training and Development (ETD) Version 6.2 | ||||
Written and Edited by the DEEP Task Force Jim Bronson, Performance Dynamics, Inc. Moe Carrick, Project Adventure, Inc. Betsy Dalgliesh, Falls River Center, Inc. Faith Evans, Playfully, Inc. Bill Proudman, Chair, Inclusivity Consulting Group, Inc. Steve Proudman, The Proudman Group, Inc. Mark Weaver, change@work, inc.. Jim Willis, Executive Edge, Inc. With Contributions from the DEEP ETD Reader Group and Participants at the 1997 and 1998 DEEP Symposiums View List Here | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE Initiative Background Intent of the Document A Note to Providers I. ETD DEFINITION A. Definition B. ETD Operating Premises C. Service Areas II. ETD ETHICAL GUIDELINES A. Responsibility to Self B. Responsibility for Professional Development and Conduct C. Responsibility to Clients/Customers D. Responsibility to Profession E. Global Responsibility III. EXEMPLARY PRACTICES A. Client Services B. Business Operations C. Business Relationships D. Practitioner Competencies 1. General SkillsIV. GLOSSARY OF TERMS APPENDICES APPENDIX A Other Organizations with Practitioner Competency Materials ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | ||||
Initiative Background
The initiative was launched in November 1997 at the EBTD pre-conference of the AEE International Conference in North Carolina, where the DEEP Task Force conducted a day long workshop with over 40 practitioners and providers engaging in dialogue about definition, ethics and best practice. Following this workshop, the Task Force met to refine the initiative process and to draft a call for involvement from ETD practitioners, providers and clients. In December 1998, a call for readers was mailed out to over 1000 ETD practitioners and providers, both members and non-members of AEE, informing them of this initiative and seeking their involvement.
A Note to Providers about How to Use this Document ETD providers should use this document to further their our own understanding and practice of ETD services. At present, there is no provider certification/endorsement system to denote provider compliance with any of the exemplary or ethical practices noted within. ETD providers are cautioned to use the information in this document to strengthen their practice of ETD rather than as marketing material that may denote adherence. | ||||
A. Definition Experiential Training and Development (ETD) is a client centered approach to individual, group, and organizational learning that engages the adult learner, using the elements of action, reflection, transfer, and support. ETD synthesizes knowledge from the practices of experiential learning, adult learning and organization development.
B. Experiential Training and Development Operating Premises A. ETD is a set of human and organizational services rooted in the provider’s knowledge of the client system, and aimed towards the healthy and profitable evolution of people and organizations. B. Learning involves an integration and/or change in the thoughts, feelings, attitudes, and behavior on the part of individuals, groups, and/or organizational cultures. C. Learning is a product of experience. Experience-based learning (action alone) becomes experiential when the elements of reflection (reflection optimizes learning), transfer (transfer applies learning), and support (support maintains transfer) are present. D. The capacity to learn as an adult is more effective when the whole person is engaged: the thinking, feeling, and behavioral domains. For example, information that is synthesized with emotions, values, and actions produces learning that is more lasting than mere memorization of facts. E. Training involves transferring specific "task-oriented" learning between similar settings. For example, a project-management spreadsheet or employee appraisal system, newly learned through a classroom, can then be applied in the job. F. Development involves transferring general "process-oriented" learning between very different settings. For example, collaborative problem solving or conflict resolution approaches, learned in a team building session, can then be applied back in the office. G. ETD providers and businesses grow and develop by continually striving to offer high value to the clients and marketplace as they evolve. This requires an adequate focus on client organizations’ business outcomes (e.g. effectiveness, efficiencies, quality, cost) as well as individual participants’ needs, and ETD models and methodologies. C. Service Areas ETD practitioners serve client organizations in any one or a combination of three areas:
| ||||
Establishing a set of ethical guidelines is a critical step in the professional development of the ETD community. The guidelines are meant to provide a baseline for behavior among colleagues, and to support a constructive dialogue in the development of ETD. By establishing a set of ethical guidelines, the ETD profession aspires to raise the level of professionalism in the field. The ethical guidelines are not intended as a punitive tool for ETD providers but, rather, to serve to increase credibility and recognition in the marketplace. As an ETD practitioner, I am committed to supporting and acting in accordance with the following ethical guidelines A. Responsibility to Self
B. Responsibility for Professional Development and Conduct
C. Responsibility to Clients/Customers
D. Responsibility to Profession
E. Global Responsibility
| ||||
What follows are methods and approaches which exemplary providers and practitioners use in delivering ETD services. In choosing how to apply exemplary practices, providers and practitioners focus on their own strengths and limitations, as well as on their client’s unique situation, needs and objectives. A. Client Services 1. Definition of Client Service ETD client services are divided into three service areas.
2. Design and Delivery
3. Evaluation
B. Business Operations 1. Mission/Philosophy
2. Administration
3. Sales and Marketing
C. Business Relationships 1. Relationships with Clients and Individuals
2. Relationships with Personnel and Sub-Contractors
3. Relationships with Colleagues and Other Providers
4. Contribution to the Profession and Community
D. Practitioner Competencies This section offers professional competencies which practitioners should aspire to. The section is divided into general skills (those which are applicable to all service areas), followed by three segments which cite skills relevant to each ETD service area. Practitioners are additionally encouraged to affiliate with other specialized organizations, some of which are named in Appendix A. 1. General Skills 1.1 Personal Development
1.2 Client Relations and Development
1.3 Assessment and Design
1.4 Implementation
1.5 Evaluation
2. Practitioner Competencies for Relationship Development Service Area 2.1 Assessment & Design Additional competencies required of ETD practitioners providing relationship development services:
2.2 Facilitation Additional competencies required of ETD practitioners providing relationship development services:
2.3 Follow-Up Additional competencies required of ETD practitioners providing relationship development services:
3. Practitioner Competencies for Performance Enhancement Service Area 3.1 Assessment & Design Additional competencies required of ETD practitioners providing performance enhancement services (e.g. knowledge/skill training):
3.2 Implementation Additional competencies required of ETD practitioners providing performance enhancement services (e.g. knowledge/skill training):
3.3 Follow through Additional competencies required of ETD practitioners providing performance enhancement services (e.g. knowledge/skill training):
4. Practitioner Competencies for Consultation/ Intervention Service Area 4.1 Initial Client Contact Additional competencies required of ETD practitioners providing consultation/intervention services:
4.2 Implementation Additional competencies required of ETD practitioners providing consultation/intervention services:
4.3 Follow through Additional competencies required of ETD practitioners providing consultation/intervention services:
| ||||
These definitions are meant to be contextual for use with this document. Adult Learning: The life long capacity to develop and grow emotionally, spiritually, intellectually. Adventure-Based Learning: A learning process characterized by perceived risks and unknown outcomes, historically associated with but not limited to outdoor activities (e.g. wilderness travel, rock climbing, challenge course, etc.) Challenge Course: Any program and/or site that utilizes one or all of the following: elements that require belaying, elements that require spotting, and initiatives (from Association for Challenge Course Technology’s Technical Standards for Challenge Course Facilitators) Client-Centered: A provider’s approach to customer interaction which maintains the client’s needs and wants as the top focus and priority at all times. Client/Customer: The primary contact throughout the delivery of the ETD service, with whom the provider negotiates the scope of services (e.g. the desired outcomes, contractual agreements, remuneration, evaluation and ongoing communication). Colleagues: Practitioners who contribute to the betterment of the ETD profession through collaboration and competition. Consultant: Individual who assesses organizational systems and human interactions to assist in the design and development of interventions toward a designated end. Exemplary Practices: Methods and approaches that adept and skillful providers and practitioners use in delivering ETD services, which reflect positively on the profession. Experience-Based: An action-based process by which knowledge, skills, and values are derived from direct experience. Learning and behavior change occurs when this experience is integrated and applied through reflection and interactive discussion. May be indoors or out. Experiential Education and Learning: A process through which a learner constructs knowledge, skill and value from direct experience.* Experiential education and learning encompasses a wide variety of teaching methods including, but not limited to, outdoor challenge course, adventure-based programming, organization training and development, simulations, cooperative education, and counseling / therapeutic education. (* from the Association for Experiential Education’s definition of experiential education) Facilitator: An individual responsible for managing the learning environment to assist individuals/groups to achieve value from the learning process. Individual: One of the direct recipients of ETD services. May or may not include the client. Other recipients include organizational entities (divisions and departments), management teams, and work groups. Informed Consent: The ongoing relationship of providing relevant information which allows all individuals to choose and agree to their level of engagement. Integrity: The consistent congruence between practitioner’s values and beliefs with one’s words and actions. Intervention: Involves the interruption of a process or event to draw attention to patterns of behavior as they serve or impede the defined objectives of both the group and the individuals. Subsequent action steps are developed. Needs Assessment: A diagnostic process to gather information on organizational context, culture and interpersonal dynamics to determine the goals and objectives for the design of the ETD services to be delivered. Organization Development: Focuses on the process of human interaction, leadership skills and team performance, as businesses grow or adapt in a changing environment. OD practitioners typically work with clients or individuals over time to achieve alignment around core values and business purposes. Practitioner: The individual with the capabilities to deliver an ETD service. May be a trainer, facilitator or consultant. Process: The way people interrelate to accomplish a task. The "how." Provider/Contractor: The organization/individual responsible for offering and contracting ETD services to clients. Reflection: A process of considering what has happened and extracting appropriate learning from an experience. Sub-Contractor: Practitioner or provider who delivers ETD services for the primary provider, but is not an employee of the primary provider. Task: The business of accomplishing specific goals and objectives. The "what." Trainer: Practitioner who leads and directs prescribed learning for skill development, toward measurable explicit results. Training: "Task" oriented learning designed for explicit, measurable skill development, delivered in a prescribed way. Transfer: A process wherein participants apply learning from their direct experience to another context/environment (i.e. to their work environment). Support: The application of tools and techniques to extend and reinforce a participant’s learning over time (i.e. mid-service check-ins to fine-tune the process, follow-up meeting to reinforce the learning from an earlier ETD service event). | ||||
OTHER ORGANIZATIONS WITH PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY MATERIALS American Society for Training and Development (ASTD) Association for Challenge Course Technology (ACCT) International Association of Facilitators The Organization Development Institute Organization Development Network | ||||
The process of creating an ETD definition, code of ethics and set of exemplary practices, with input from a broad spectrum of providers and practitioners for an emerging Experiential Training and Development (ETD) profession, was not an easy task. Throughout this eighteen-month process we have had much back and forth dialogue about everything from the content pieces of the document to the viability and usefulness of the whole initiative itself. Through it all, a number of providers and practitioners were readily available to offer helpful feedback. Their efforts were instrumental in the completion of this document. The Task Force would specifically like to thank the following people: Ellerie Brownfain, in her role, as the EBTD Professional Group chair, for her willingness to make the bold initial commitment to support the initiative. Mary Butler and Richard Romero, as convenors of the 1997 EBTD pre-conference in North Carolina for creating space in their conference schedule for Bill Proudman to conduct the first day long DEEP symposium for 40 practitioners. Sylvia Dresser for her thorough and detailed review of this document for grammatical and formatting suggestions (on short notice). Mark Havens for his work about the definition of experiential training and development that led to the evolution of the definition in the current document. Cheryl Perlitz, as the 1998 EBTD pre-conference convenor at Lake Tahoe, for her support and effort in scheduling the second DEEP symposium. Finally, we would like to thank the numerous people from the DEEP Reader Group who responded to our drafts with their comments as well as those who attended the two DEEP Symposiums and whose comments resulted in version 1 and version 6 of the document. Listed below is our best attempt to acknowledge some of the many people who provided critical feedback which assisted the task force in arriving at this final document.
|